Home * Cloak & Dagger * Press Release * Osborne Ultimatum * Blog * Bio * Photos * Leutrell Osborne & Associates * FAQ / Glossary * Freedom Program * Martin Luther King Truth Committee * COINTELPRO * CIA & Drugs * 9/11 * Factbook * Links * CIA Video Links * Wildcard * MLK Videos * Dirty Tricks * Osborne Effect * PR * Photo 4

DAMAGE REPORT: What Really Happened on 9/11

Leutrell Osborne has also reported his findings on 9/11 coverage to the Senate Intelligence Committee. From the Wilderness (FTW) website confirms that the complete version of Izvestia coverage came into its possession "thanks to former CIA counter-terror case officer, Leutrell Osborne .... The story had been brought to his attention by his Russian-speaking son and had fortunately been saved in its original form before it was sanitized of several key sentences". The original unsanitized version curiously began:

"Yesterday at the headquarters of Central Intelligence Service in Langley a confidential meeting between one of the Deputy Directors of CIA and a special messenger of Russian Intelligence Service took place. According to NewsRu sources he delivered to his American colleagues some documents including audio tapes with telephone conversations directly relating to terrorist attacks on Washington and New York last Tuesday. According to these sources, Russian Intelligence agents know the organizers and executors of these terrorist attacks. More than that, Moscow warned Washington about preparation to these actions a couple of weeks before they happened."


I believe that, from the information I have seen,"Mike"Vreeland tried to pass information to the Canadian government that should have been passed to the U.S. government. That information had to do with the attacks of Sept. 11. Whatever other attempts were made by Vreeland and his attorneys to alert U.S. and Canadian officials of the attacks, it is clear that he did pass information about the pending attacks to his guards in August. I am willing to go to the Secretary of the Navy to determine whether or not he was actually a Navy officer.

"I know that there have been other U.S. citizens with a similar background used on missions similar to what has been alleged by Vreeland. This man fits a pattern. I would like for the Secret Service to put him on a polygraph.
--"Mike" Osborne, a veteran former CIA case officer with 26 years of experience in counter-terrorism.

With a court record now estimated to approach 10,000 pages, the case of Delmart "Mike" Vreeland is starting to attract worldwide attention. Vreeland, with a growing amount of evidence admitted into court record in Toronto, Canada, claims to be a former U.S. Naval lieutenant assigned to the Office of Naval Intelligence. He was jailed in Canada -- at the request of U.S. authorities -- in December 2000 after returning from Moscow.

Although Canadian authorities initially alleged vague fraud charges against him and also held him on an extradition warrant alleging credit card fraud in Michigan, the actual motive for his arrest now seems to be something quite different. All Canadian charges against Vreeland were dropped this March and he has been granted political refugee status in Canada until the extradition issues are resolved.

Vreeland's position is he returned from Russia to meet with a Canadian and a Russian intelligence operative, and had intended to hand over a sealed pouch containing intelligence documents. When the handoff was compromised and the Canadian did not show for the Toronto meet, Vreeland opened the pouch and looked at some of the documents. Those documents, which he later had translated, gave specific warnings of the pending WTC attacks that took place nine months later. Again, on its face, since these documents were in a sealed intelligence pouch, this indicates intelligence operatives were aware of the contents because they had placed them there originally.

According to both Vreeland and his lawyers, as reported in numerous interviews with this writer and other members of the FTW staff immediately after his arrest, Vreeland began making urgent attempts to alert both Canadian and U.S. intelligence officials of the coming danger.

After eight months of unsuccessful attempts to have either Canadian or U.S. intelligence services debrief him, Vreeland wrote a desperate, last-ditch warning in August. Through means he will not disclose, he acquired two high-tech Pilot water-based pens with light blue ink and used them to write the letter. The only pens permitted by Canadian jail authorities were oil-based, dark blue Bic pens.

Immediately after writing the letter, Vreeland notified his jailers that he had pens which might be considered contraband. A Sept. 17 letter from the Ministry of Correctional Services was entered as Exhibit "M" into court records on Oct. 7, along with Vreeland's warning letter which had been opened on Sept. 14 and marked as Exhibit "N." The letter states, "On August 13, 2001 inmate Vreeland's corridor #2 was searched and as far as we know 2 blue ink pens were removed from his cell because they were considered contraband. There is no written record of them being placed in his personal property. He did submit a request to have them returned to him on August 14, 2001, but was denied."

Since the ink on the warning letter, if tested, will match the ink in the confiscated pens, there can be no doubt that the letter was written a month before the attacks.

In an interview with this writer published on April 4, Vreeland clearly stated his belief that Al Qaeda operations had been completely penetrated by U.S. intelligence services. That belief is supported by a statement in his warning letter.

The statement, following a list of potential targets that included the WTC, the Pentagon and the White House said, "Let one happen, stop the rest." Such a statement could only imply complete penetration or compromise of the terrorist cells perpetrating the attacks.

Compelling evidence continues to grow that Vreeland was, in fact, a U.S. Navy officer. On Jan. 10 from open court with a court reporter recording the conversation, his attorneys placed a speaker-phone call to the Pentagon. A Pentagon operator, after checking a military database, confirmed Vreeland was a U.S. Navy officer and provided an office listing and a telephone number for his office. In addition, redacted and incomplete military records provided by the Pentagon to the Canadian courts indicate Vreeland had a service record of more than 1,200 pages.

This is difficult to reconcile with the U.S. Navy's assertion that Vreeland was discharged as a seaman recruit after four months of unsatisfactory service in 1986.

No press entity has covered the Vreeland case more than FTW. This writer has traveled twice to Toronto, sat in on court proceedings, and retained the services of a Canadian correspondent to cover the case. I have interviewed Vreeland personally and conducted numerous interviews with his attorneys. Greta Knutzen, FTW's Canadian correspondent, has also interviewed Vreeland and his attorneys, as well as Vreeland's mother. Knutzen has attended every court proceeding since January. All of our previous reporting on the case can be located on the Internet at www.copvcia.com. "Mike" Vreeland believes that if he is successfully extradited to the U.S., he will be assassinated. Previous press stories concerning Vreeland's criminal past and a criminal arrest record fail to account for the fact that, as an undercover operative who targeted organized crime and terrorist organizations, a criminal record would have been necessary to give him credibility with organizations that previously demonstrated capabilities to retrieve law enforcement records. They also fail to account for an Oct. 2, 1986 Los Angeles Times story that lists Vreeland as a non-criminal witness to a major cocaine bust carried out by LAPD investigators known to have contacts with USG intelligence services.

There is much about Vreeland's past that is objectionable, questionable, or both. But even in a worst-case scenario, nothing in his past explains how he was able to write a detailed warning of the attacks before they occurred, and why the intelligence services of both Canada and the U.S. ignored attempts to warn them while both Vreeland and his attorneys were banging down their doors.


There is clear and substantial evidence to suggest that the Bush Administration had sufficient foreknowledge of the attacks of Sept. 11 to have prevented them. Rather than viewing each of the four listed areas as a separate piece of evidence, they should be considered as a body, in the exact same way exhibits presented to a jury in a criminal trial are viewed as a body. By viewing the evidence in this manner, an unavoidable conclusion is reached -- the USG knew 25 hijackers during the week of Sept. 9 were going to use United and American airlines commercial planes, some of them likely originating in Boston, to attack the WTC and the Pentagon. A multitude of press stories and intelligence reports indicate the WTC would have been the primary target.

Given the financial commitments made during insider trading activity that occurred immediately before the attacks involving businesses that were directly damaged by the attacks, the threats had clearly moved from the realm of speculation to reality. Why else would mysterious investors have risked millions of dollars to purchase the put options? There is compelling evidence to suggest these trades were noted by the CIA and other USG entities.

Recently, Rep. Cynthia McKinney, D-Ga., has been widely criticized in the mainstream press for raising the need for a Congressional investigation to answer some of these obvious questions. This, in spite of the fact that popular reaction indicates a different sentiment. An opinion poll, conducted by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution just a day after McKinney's remarks received wide public attention in a Washington Post story dated April 12, was pulled after poll numbers showed that 51 percent of the respondents agreed with McKinney.

The people seem to recognize and agree with the opinion of former CIA officer "Mike" Osborne who says, "I think that the U.S. government needs to get behind McKinney's questions because her agenda is truth and justice, and nothing else."

Part Nine: AWOL in Wonderland


Leutrell Osborne is an anterrorism expert who worked for the CIA for 25 years before quitting in disgust. A security consultant with ties to the Black Congressional Caucus, Osborne was interviewed on national television the day after 9-11. Provided with updates throughout my journey down the Vreeland rabbithole, he was both skeptical and supportive of Vreelan’s claims. He also had words of warning, “I would back off, and watch it, watch everything that happens, it’s volatile, what have you got? Who’s pulling the strings? I’m not ready to say yet. But I’m getting closer.”


[1] Video of speech by Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD Sept. 11, 2004
http://video. google.com/ videoplay? docid=-690006557 1556128674

[2] Video of speech by Lt. Col. Robert Bowman at the American Scholars Symposium: 9/11 and the Neo-Con Agenda June 25, 2006 http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=MKoqEQ7hb_ 4

[3] Architects and Engineers Petition to Reinvestigate 9/11 Signed by More Than 230 Architects and Engineers 2007
http://www.ae911tru th.org/joinus. php

[4] Statement by Maj. Jon Fox in support of Architects and Engineers petition 2007
http://www.ae911tru th.org/profile. php?uid=998894

[5] U.S. Navy 'Top Gun' Pilot Questions 9/11 by Alan Miller Sept. 5, 2007
http://www.opednews .com/articles/ genera_alan_ mil_070905_ u_s__navy_ _top_gun_ _.htm

[6] Photos of WTC victim, Edna Cintron, waving inside impact hole in World Trade Center North Tower
http://patriotsques tion911.com/ survivors. html#Cintron

[7] U.S. Department of Defense News Transcript Secretary Rumsfeld Interview with Parade Magazine Oct. 12, 2001
http://www.defensel ink.mil/transcri pts/transcript. aspx?TranscriptI D=3845

[8] Speech by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld in Baghdad Dec. 24, 2004
http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=x6Xoxaf1Al0

[9] Letter to the editor of the Michigan Daily by Lt. Col. Shelton Lankford Feb. 5, 2007
http://www.michigan daily.com/ home/index. cfm?event= displayArticleCo mments&ustory_ id=ddcccb1d- e57d-416e- 928a-da559178627 2#542c84e6- 9719-4cfc- 880c-6ceca6fad92 e

[10] Photos of WTC victim, Edna Cintron, waving inside impact hole in World Trade Center North Tower
http://patriotsques tion911.com/ survivors. html#Cintron

[11] Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges by Paul Joseph Watson Jan. 5, 2006
http://www.prisonpl anet.com/ articles/ january2006/ 050106silverstei nanswers. htm

[12] Audio recording of interview of Lt. Col. Jeff Latas by Rob Balsamo June 25, 2007
http://video. google.com/ videoplay? docid=-185808748 7546809825& q=jeff+latas& total=14& start=0&num= 10&so=0&type= search&plindex= 5

[13] Video documentary Pandora's Black Box, Chapter 2, Flight of American 77 by Pilots for 9/11 Truth
http://video. google.com/ videoplay? docid=-867206657 1196607580& q=pandora% 27s+black+ box&total= 42&start= 0&num=10& so=0&type= search&plindex= 0

[14] Petition to Reinvestigate 9/11 Signed by Over 100 Prominent Americans Oct. 26, 2004
http://www.911truth .org/article. php?story= 2004102609305963 3

[15] The American Reichstag Fire - 911 and Non-investigation by Capt. Eric May 2005
http://mujca. com/captain. htm

[16] Interview of Commander Ted Muga on the Alex Jones Show April 11, 2007
http://prisonplanet .tv/members/ audio/110407muga .mp3 (Subscription required)

[17] Impossible to Prove a Falsehood True: Aircraft Parts as a Clue to their Identity by Col. George Nelson, MBA
http://www.physics9 11.net/georgenel son

[18] Testimony of Maj. John M. Newman, PhD, Congressional Briefing: The 9/11 Commission Report – One Year later July 22, 2005
http://www.vt911. org/McKinneyRepo rt20050722transc ript.pdf

[19] Radio interview of Col. Ronald D. Ray by Alex Jones, June 30, 2006 (Subscription required.) Summarized in July 1, 2006 article on propagandamatrix. com
http://www.propagan damatrix. com/articles/ july2006/ 010706doesnthunt .htm

[20] Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance by Paul Joseph Watson
Feb. 28, 2007
http://www.prisonpl anet.com/ articles/ february2007/ 280207timestamp. htm

[21] Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges by Paul Joseph Watson Jan. 5, 2006
http://www.prisonpl anet.com/ articles/ january2006/ 050106silverstei nanswers. htm

[22] Video recording of statement by Maj. Scott Ritter July 22, 3006
http://video. google.com/ videoplay? docid=1232419751 782017310& q=%22ray+ mcgovern% 22&hl=en

[23] Radiation Expert Claims High-Radiation Readings Near Pentagon After 9/11 Indicate Depleted Uranium Used by Greg Szymanski Aug. 18, 2005
http://www.arcticbe acon.com/ articles/ 18-Aug-2005. html

[24] Testimony of Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer before the Armed Services Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, Feb. 15, 2006
http://www.investig ativeproject. org/documents/ testimony/ 251.pdf

[25] Interview of Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer on Fox News Aug. 24, 2005
http://video. google.com/ videoplay? docid=1956542165 192088795& hl=en

[26] Navy Captain Backs Able Danger Claims, Fox News Aug. 23, 2005
http://www.foxnews. com/story/ 0,2933,166504, 00.html

[27] Debunking The Debunkers by Joel Skousen Feb. 14, 2005
http://www.rense. com/general62/ deun.htm

[28] Video documentary, One Nation Under Siege Gen. Albert Stubblebine’s statement can be viewed at
http://www.undersie gemovie.com/ media/stubblebin e.wmv

[29] Military Intelligence Hall of Fame Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Military_ Intelligence_ Hall_of_Fame

[30] Former Vietnam Combat and Commercial Pilot Firm Believer 9/11 Was Inside Government Job by Greg Szymanski July 17, 2005
http://www.arcticbe acon.com/ 17-Jul-2005. html

[31] Video documentary 9/11 Ripple Effect by William Lewis and Dave vonKleist August, 2007
http://www.911rippl eeffect.com/

[32] Pilot who flew 2 planes used on 9/11 doesn't believe official story by American Buddhist Net Sept. 13, 2007
http://americanbudd hist.net/ pilot-who- flew-2-planes- used-9-11- doesnt-believe- official- story

[33] Interview of Capt. Russ Wittenberg Sept. 16, 2004
http://911undergrou nd.com/WING_ TV_2004-09- 16_Russ_Wittenbe rg_Interview. MP3

[34] Interview of Col. Ann Wright and Laurie Van Auken by Richard Greene on the Clout show on Air America Radio Network Sept. 11, 2007
http://www.yourbbsu cks.com/forum/ aacl091107. mp3

[35] Petition to Reinvestigate 9/11 Signed by Over 100 Prominent Americans Oct. 26, 2004
http://www.911truth .org/article. php?story= 2004102609305963 3

[36] Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report by Alan Miller Sept. 23, 2007
http://www.opednews .com/articles/ genera_alan_ mil_070922_ seven_cia_ veterans_ c.htm

[37] Eight U.S. State Department Veterans Challenge the Official Account of 9/11 by Alan Miller Jan. 5, 2008
http://www.opednews .com/articles/ genera_alan_ mil_080104_ eight_u_s_ _state_dep. htm

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
U.S. Military Officers Want 9/11 Reinvestigated

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

www.PatriotsQuestio n911.com

Alan Miller is author of the website http://www.Patriots Question911. com


In a few short minutes:

* You'll see an excerpt from a TV
program - shot in March of 2000 -
that predicted a government attack
on the World Trade Center using
a hijacked plane.

* You'll hear how financially
successful TV and radio programs
in the US are routinely canceled
if they fail to agree to remove
government criticism from their

* You'll learn how the CIA spies on
Hollywood producers, directors and actors
in an attempt to find out what projects
they're working on so they can derail
ones that have an anti-government

A rare glimpse into the actual mechanics
of how the corporate/government alliance
keeps the US safe *from* democracy.

Please make sure you share this one...


- Brasscheck

P.S. Please share Brasscheck TV e-mails and
videos with friends and colleagues.


Cooperative Research TIMELINE: